← Back to all cases

CAMP49/2024

PHAM THI HUE v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD

EN

Case Details

Case ReferenceCAMP49/2024
CourtCourt of Appeal of the High Court 高等法院(上訴法庭)
Date Published2026-03-19
LanguageEnglish
NCN[2026] HKCA 350
Claimant / ApplicantPHAM THI HUE
Defendant / RespondentTORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD
JudgesHon Au JA, Hon Chow JA

Judgment Summary

Facts

  • Director of Immigration rejected non-refoulement claim on 25 January 2017
  • Torture Claims Appeal Board dismissed appeal on 24 May 2019
  • Fung J refused leave for judicial review on 7 February 2024
  • Court of Appeal dismissed extension of time application on 2 August 2024
  • Applicant applied for leave to appeal to CFA on 12 January 2026
  • Applicant failed to lodge written submissions contrary to directions
  • Applicant cited lack of legal knowledge and detention as reasons for delay

Issues

  • Whether the appeal involves a question of great general or public importance
  • Whether leave should be granted under the 'or otherwise' limb of s 22(1)(b)
  • Whether the Applicant's explanations for delay are acceptable
  • Whether the intended appeal has any reasonable prospect of success

Outcome

  • Application for leave to appeal refused
  • Notice of Motion dismissed
  • Application determined on paper without oral hearing
  • No question of great general or public importance identified
  • Intended appeal found to have no reasonable prospect of success

Implication

  • Strict adherence to procedural directions required for CFA leave applications
  • General allegations without particulars will not establish viable grounds
  • Feeble excuses for delay, such as lack of legal knowledge, are rejected
  • No leave granted where no question of public importance is identified

Laws & Authorities Cited

  • §Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance (Cap. 484), s.22(1)(b)
  • §Practice Direction 2.1, para.3
  • §Pham Thi Hue v. Torture Claims Appeal Board [2024] HKCFI 411
  • §Pham Thi Hue v. Torture Claims Appeal Board [2026] HKCA 350